Home
 

Barbara Lee Speaks for Osama, not for Me.

  • How having a serious foreign policy team, led by Dr. Condaleeza Rice, trained by Ronald Reagan, has brought about great success.
  • The progress in Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, India and other locations, and the surrounding of Iran.
  • The decline of Jihadi terror groups like al Qaeda, Abu Abbas, Abu Nidal, Hamas, Hezbollah and others.

When Barbara Lee voted against taking action against Osama and Wahhabi Jihadism four days after the towers fell, she began the process of undermining American will that bin Laden and Ahmedinejad count on for their eventual victory.  Sapping our determination depends upon making sure that we hear little about our military and policy successes and that we must endure a constant harangue about perceived failures. 

The liberal Main Stream Media embrace this process wholeheartedly:  they dream of a return to their glory days in the seventies when they caused the last victory of the Soviet Union in Viet Nam and brought down Richard M. Nixon, whom they detested.  They have had to cover ever since for that remarkable failure, Jimmy Carter, with his misery index in the twenties and the chaos he caused in the Middle East.  They stuck us with him, and must also try to make us forget the antidote to Carter, Ronald Reagan.  At least they want us to forget the way they opposed his foreign policy as they oppose the foreign policy today of those trained by President Reagan.

Today Barbara Lee, the Main Stream Media, and all the other tools of the left want us to ignore the progress in West and Central Asia just as they want us to ignore the ongoing embrace of the chaotic policies of Carter and the remnants of his team.  We read in copious detail about every ambush in Baghdad, but never get from them a responsible view of the overall situation.  We wander through a flourishing forest weeping over a single leaf with brown rot.

After September 11th we as a nation had an absolute responsibility to cause the governments supporting Jihadi terror groups to stand down or risk our wrath.  We have done remarkably well in the last five years.

  • Afghanistan:  The Taliban fell in a matter of weeks.  Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden lost their sponsor and most of their members.  They have had to hide in caves ever since.  The people have leaders elected by the people for the first time in five thousand years. The countryside is over 70% pacified.  Many modernizing projects have begun.
  • Libya:  Muammar Ghadafi, sponsor of various Wahhabi groups over the years, decided to give up on Jihad.  He exposed the nuclear Jihadist, A. Q. Khan, who has lost his influence in the world.
  • Iraq:  The Ba’athist government of Saddam Hussein and his sons fell in three weeks.  Abu Nidal, participants in the 1972 Munich Olympics terror, and Abu Abbas, the hijackers of the cruise ship Achille Lauro, lost their headquarters in Baghdad, and have ceased to exist.  Their leaders have all died or languish in jail.  We and the Iraqi forces in training have secured 80 % of the country, which is safer than 20% of Oakland.
  • Syria:  The Ba’athist government of Bashar Assad has retreated since the invasion of Iraq.  They have lost influence amongst terror groups and the rest of the West Asian countries.
  • Lebanon:  With the decline of Syria, the country has progressed towards self-determination.  Beirut, formerly the Paris of the Middle East, has once again become a center of Middle Eastern civilization.  Hamas, Hezbollah, and Islamic Jihad have declined in power.
  • Sudan:  The World has begun to focus attention on the terror sponsoring government of Sudan, and it has begun to pull back.
  • Pakistan:  Pervez Mussharif has cracked down on many of the terror groups there.  He cooperates with us now, although George Bush famously could not come up with his name in the 2000 election.  India and Pakistan have never enjoyed relations as warm as they do today.  American influence in the sub-continent has never before attained the current height.
  • Iran:  The United States and its allies now surround the Mullocracy.  We have a tremendous strategic position in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.  Other neighbors such as Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan may have an interest in regime change to their south.  If the Mullahs fall, so does Hezbollah, the last truly powerful Jihadi terror group in the world.

Any objective view of such progress would call the foreign policy team that constructed such a strong position “brilliant.”  Their hatred of George Bush may require Barbara Lee and the Main Stream Media to lie some about this success, but why do they hate Dr. Rice, General Powell and the others experts who got us to this point?

We lost 6,281 American lives in three weeks on the ten square mile Iwo Jima in order to have three airstrips from which we could bomb Japan in retribution for December Seventh.  We lose more than three thousand lives each year to drug motivated gang warfare in our cities.  We lost over 3,000 lives in a couple of hours on September 11th, 2001.

We have lost fewer than 3,000 lives in West and Central Asia since then, liberating 50,000,000 people and securing over 350,000 square miles.  All of these losses sting American families greatly.  Objectively, however, which group of losses has gained the greatest good for all of mankind?

Vote for John den Dulk to continue the sound foreign policy that keeps us safe in this troubled world.


We DID get Saddam, and Abu Abbas, and Abu Nidal

 

Den Dulk for Congress
2532 Durant Ave, #100
Berkeley, CA 94704
© 2006 John Den Dulk for Congress | Privacy Policy | Paid for by: Den Dulk for Congress